Nov.
21, 2003
Board
Approves Actuarial Report
At its November meeting, the State Teachers Retirement Board
approved the final annual valuation report from the board’s
actuary, Mellon (formerly known as Buck Consultants). Last month,
the board received the preliminary report, as well as the five-year
experience review of the system covering July 1, 1998–June 30,
2003.
Based on
the results of these studies, the Retirement Board adopted several
changes to the system’s actuarial assumptions to reflect that
career teachers are working longer before retiring, there are
fewer disability retirements and members are living longer.
The board also adjusted two significant economic assumptions
by changing the average annual salary increase assumption for
members to 5.5% from 5% and the actuarial assumed rate of return
for investments to 8% from 7.75%. The board also preserved the
1% allocation of employer contributions to the Health Care Stabilization
Fund for the 2003–2004 fiscal year (July 1, 2003–June 30, 2004).
With these
changes, Mellon’s final report noted the following:
- The system’s funding
period — the number of years required to pay off the unfunded
accrued liability — now stands at 42.3 years. This represents
an increase from last year’s number of 39
years.
- The system’s funded
ratio — the market-related value of assets compared to accrued
liabilities — is 75.2%.
Health
Care Costs Continue to be a Main Focus of the Retirement Board
On Nov. 19, the Retirement Board met with the Health Care
Advocates for STRS to continue their discussions about health
care funding. Based on those discussions, the Retirement Board
approved a motion that authorized staff to:
- Further investigate
and provide recommendations on these five areas for controlling
health care costs:
- Pharmacy plan
management,
- Health risk assessment,
- Patient management
programs,
- Alternative provider
delivery systems, and
- Health care staffing
at STRS Ohio.
- Take a leadership
role in partnership with the Health Care Advocates for STRS
in forming a coalition of all five public pension systems,
labor and management in working with the Legislature to
develop affordable and sustainable health care coverage
for Ohio’s public employees. Any proposal would include
retiree medical accounts if these are deemed a viable supplement
for assisting with health care costs. At the same time,
STRS Ohio will participate with the Health Care Advocates
for STRS to work with the Legislature going forward to accomplish
affordable and sustainable health care coverage for STRS
Ohio members.
- Provide an analysis
of the data on the net cost of providing health care to
reemployed retirees and make a recommendation regarding
this coverage.
STRS
Ohio Receives “AAA Rating”
Standard & Poor’s
notified STRS Ohio this week that it has assigned a “AAA” issuer
credit rating to the system. This rating is Standard & Poor’s
highest possible rating for reflecting an organization’s ability
to pay its financial obligations.
Election
Process Begins for Active Teacher Seat on Board
Notices will be sent to all STRS Ohio reporting employers
and representatives of educational organizations next week announcing
the election for an active teacher seat on the Retirement Board.
The seat, which is currently held by Eugene Norris, is for a
term running from Sept. 1, 2004–Aug. 31, 2008. The deadline
for return of petitions is Feb. 27, 2004.
Retirement,
Investment Transactions Approved
The Retirement Board approved the following retirements
and investment transactions:
- 21 disability retirements
were granted.
- 209 active members
were approved for service retirement; 168 inactive retirements
were approved.
- In October, fixed-income
purchases totaled $676.8 million, domestic equity purchases
totaled $372.7 million and real estate purchases totaled
$19.5 million.
Additional
Items Reported at the Meeting
Interim Executive Director Damon Asbury reviewed staff actions
in response to proposed pension legislation moving through the
Statehouse and a recent actuarial report presented to the Ohio
Retirement Study Council.
All
Five Systems United in Concern About Pension Legislation
Asbury reported
that both board chair Mr. Norris and he have gone on record
in testimony, through the media, and in our member and legislative
communications as supporting changes that strengthen the functioning
and monitoring of the retirement systems, and provide for open
and transparent financial disclosure. However, we are adamantly
opposed to two provisions contained in Sub. H.B. 227. The first
provision affects the retirement boards’ investment authority
and fiduciary responsibility to manage the retirement systems’
assets. Being referred to as a “buy Ohio” mandate, it requires
all five Ohio public pension systems to execute 70% of all stock
and bond trades with Ohio brokers. In addition, if outside money
managers are used, 50% of all assets must be placed with Ohio
money managers.
The second
provision, which was added to the bill on Nov. 12, gives the
Treasurer of the State the authority to hire and fire the executive
director of each system.
In voicing
their opposition to Sub. H.B. 227, all five systems’ have explained
that these two provisions will result in exorbitant costs to
the systems, impede trustees’ fiduciary duties, and threaten
the tax status of the systems.
The five
public systems have estimated that the investment mandates alone
could cost the pension plans as much as $180 million, and that
does not include transition costs. In Ohio, current statute
already exists to direct boards to give consideration to Ohio
brokers, “all things being equal.” Further, imposing pre-determined
quotas could limit the ability of system trustees to act in
a manner which is in the best interests of their members — which
is essential if the systems are to remain qualified trusts under
the Internal Revenue Code and thus defer taxation of the contributions
and earnings until a benefit is paid.
Since the
Legislature will not return until Dec. 2 and expects to finish
up by Christmas, there is not time for the normal process of
the two chambers reviewing each other’s bills. What may happen
are behind-the-scene negotiations on a final compromise bill
with votes on the floor to accept the compromise.
There has
been a concerted effort on the part of all the systems to encourage
members and advocate organizations to share their concerns about
these bill provisions with the members of the House and Senate
and Gov. Bob Taft. The executive directors are meeting with
key senators and a joint letter from the board chairs has gone
to leadership.
System
Responds to ORSC Actuarial Report
At its November
meeting, the Ohio Retirement Study Council (ORSC) heard a presentation
from its actuary, Milliman USA, on three of the Ohio systems,
including STRS Ohio. Milliman’s report had suggested that increasing
the statutory limitations on employer and/or employee contributions
or making changes to pension age and service requirements would
be a way to reduce STRS Ohio’s funding period to the commonly
used industry standard of 30 years by June 2004.
In response,
Kim Nicholl (representing the Retirement Board’s actuary, Mellon)
and Interim Executive Director Asbury explained why they believe
the existing contribution rates are adequate for funding the
current level of pension benefits. As has been discussed in
the Retirement Board’s Actuarial Committee meetings, the past
three-year economic period has contributed to an increase in
our funding period to 42.3 years. However, to expect STRS Ohio,
or any system for that matter, to return to the 30-year level
in just one year’s time is not prudent.
Nicholl
explained that the funded status of the system — the ratio of
STRS Ohio assets to accrued liabilities — is a better barometer
for determining the ability of a pension fund to meet its obligations,
as not all of a plan’s obligations come due at once. Although
the funding period will increase for several years before again
entering a downward trend, STRS Ohio’s funded ratio consistently
stays around 70%. Right now, STRS Ohio has on hand 75% of the
assets needed to pay all benefits accrued to date.
In his remarks
to the ORSC, Asbury stated that while pensions remain safe and
secure, funding for health care is another issue. He reiterated
that the Retirement Board looks forward to continuing its work
with its membership, the Health Care Advocates for STRS and
the Legislature in developing a plan for finding a dedicated
revenue stream for health care funding.
Return
to listing of past issues of Board News.